So after last week’s post, there’s a lot I left unanswered.
This post will be dense. First, I’ll discuss the amendments and what’s at stake, either way. Then the judicial races will be up next. I find much joy in the judicial races. Finally, other miscellaneous state and local races in and around Jefferson County are discussed.
Amendment 1 deals with the Forever Wild Land Trust re-authorization. What is the Forever Wild Land Trust? It’s a land trust that was created 20 years ago with the purpose to preserve land, wetlands and other natural habitats for citizens. It does not utilize taxpayer money (other than hunting and fishing licenses and park visitor fees). It is up for renewal this year for another 20 years. Even so, there are opponents to renewing this measure. However, as its cause is worthy and no direct taxpayer money is being spent on this, an Amendment 1 yes vote is what is best for the state.
Amendment 2 concerns a measure that would allow the legislature to issue bonds at a lower, refinanced rate. According to Governor Bentley, this will allow the state to keep and bring “high-quality jobs” in the state of Alabama through incentives. These incentives will be used as carrots before the horses that are businesses in the state. Some have said it’s the equivalent of raising the debt ceiling, but that’s not exactly how I see it. According to Thomas Scovill, it gives the Alabama Legislature the ability to:
Continue to sell bonds under the provisions of Amendment 666 as long as the aggregate outstanding principal [sic] does not exceed $750 million. This means as the principal is paid down the state can sell new bonds as long as the outstanding debt stays below $750 million. This is a new way to authorize the assumption of debt by our state government.
Our state is hurting. We need jobs. While this might not be the best way, it is one way to do that. Long-term borrowing for a short-term solution. Until we get leaders who understand the proper balancing of government spending, borrowing, and taxing this might be the only way…for now. For Amendment 2 deserves a yes.
Amendment 3 deals with Stockton, Spanish Fort and Baldwin County. The way our lovely constitution is set up, with some local laws, rules, whatever, the whole state gets to vote on them. As any good Alabamian knows, if it doesn’t concern you and your city, county, whatever, you don’t vote on it. Leave it blank. Let the locals rule themselves. What happens in Baldwin county doesn’t matter in Madison County. There’s no reason for Tuscaloosa County residents to vote on this issue in Baldwin County.
Amendment 4 is…let’s say…complicated. Alabama’s 1901 Constitution is steeped and mired in documented ignorance, racism, and down-right unAmericanism. Votes were stolen to disenfranchise the blacks, the poor, the uneducated. Shootouts at the ballot box. The whole nine yards. It’s all documented in a book I highly recommend every Alabamian read. That book is A Century of Controversy: Constitutional Reform in Alabama edited by H. Bailey Thomson. It’s a phenomenal read. Thanks to my friend, Jesse W., for lending it to me so many years ago.
Amendment 4 has a sordid history. In 2004, there was an attempt to remove the racist language from our constitution. However, that attempt was thwarted by rumors that tax rates would go up. We have Roy Moore to thank for that one. In 2012, the measure is back around. However, this time, the amendment would not only take out the racist content, but could remove the right to an education from our constitution all together. Alabama had in its constitution a right to a public education. After the 1954 Brown v. Board decision, the state tried to remove that right. The status of that decision is still up in the air. This amendment contains a clause that will solidify that there is no right to a public education. While the aims of the creators seem to be truly innocent, this amendment is riddled with flaws and could have serious repercussions if passed. Removing racist language from our governing document is a good thing. However, this amendment does way more than that, and it could jeopardize the future of education in this state. Legislators, do your job and bring the people a document that is worthy. Amendment 4 deserves a no vote.
Amendment 5 deals with the Water Works Board of Prichard and Mobile Area Water and Sewer System. If you don’t live in this area, don’t vote on it. Be a good Alabamian and don’t vote on this unless it affects you and your interests.
Amendment 6 concerns the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. It’s straightforward. It says no one has to participate. With the Supreme Court ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services in June, I’m not really sure what effect this type of amendment will have or can have. This is a vote for or against the individual mandate. I make no recommendation on this.
Amendment 7 pertains to labor in the state. While the confusing language does nothing for lay people, the end of it says “the right of individuals to vote for public office, public votes on referenda, or votes of employee representation by secret ballot is fundamental.” However, it is not that simple. Alabama AFL-CIO President Al Henley says this amendment is in direct violation of federal law on union organization. Alabama has long been known as a right-to-work state. This ballot would prevent the card check method of union organization. This type of legislation has been used in other states such as Arizona and Utah. Whether it would withstand judicial scrutiny has yet to be seen. As long as the union organizing is federally-monitored, the safeguards are in place to prevent tampering with secret ballots. I would recommend a yes vote on Amendment 7.
Amendment 8 takes an issue with the legislative pay raise. On the surface it sounds good. However, once you clear the surface, this amendment is written in a way that is problematic. The text:
…repeal the existing provisions for legislative compensation and expenses and establish the basic compensation of the Legislature at the median household income in Alabama; to require legislators to submit signed vouchers for reimbursement for expenses; and to prohibit the Legislature from increasing the compensation or expenses payable to its members. (emphasis added)
The words with emphasis should give you something to think about. If you know anything about stats, you are familiar with mean, median, mode, and range. Median is defined as a type of average, but not an average as you and I may think about it. Median is the middle number in a listed set of numbers. The reason this is problematic is because based on which organization is compiling the numbers, the median will differ and will differ greatly. It can differ based on family size, number of incomes in a home, yearly averages that differ, etc. According to the American Community Survey, in 2011, the median household income for 2011 was $51,991 (adjusted for inflation). According to the Annual Social and Economic Supplement, the two-year average of median household income in Alabama is $42,407. See the difference of over $9,500? How the state would calculate median household income is left up in the air.
The legislative committee who presented us with these flawed amendments should be fired. Granted I say that because I’m still applying for work and I need a job, but that’s neither here nor there. Even so, I must recommend a no vote on Amendment 8.
Amendments 9 and 10 are extremely important and both deserve a yes vote. We have been trying to do business in the state of Alabama blindfolded with one hand tied behind our back with a broken kneecap. Imagine what this state could do if we took off the blindfold and untied our hand. These two amendments can fundamentally change the way we do business in this state. As far as constitutional reform, this is the type that we need. The business community supports Amendment 9 and so should we. Amendment 10 deals with outdated language in the banking arena. It’s not a cure-all, but it’s a great step in the right direction for this state and its constitution. Amendment 10 deserves a yes vote.
Finally…a few races to comment on.
Roy Moore v. Bob Vance for Alabama Chief Justice. Roy Moore is the infamous Alabama Chief Justice who defied court orders to remove a 5,280-lb granite rock from the rotunda in the Alabama Supreme Court. That was in 2003. Since being removed from office by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, he’s unsuccessfully run for Governor of Alabama twice. He’s been in and around Alabama politics, never quite going away. Now, he’s back! He’s running for his old job. After a nearly disastrous opponent, the Alabama Democrats put up Judge Bob Vance in August. Bob Vance is a respected man of the law who has not drawn the ire of many with antics and agendas. While I know some have already committed to voting one way or the other, but name recognition will carry Moore a long way. A long way in this state. I’ve made my predictions, but I think it will be 66-33% Moore or 55-45% Moore. That second prediction is based off a few conversations with the salt of the earth people. They don’t live in the city-filled intellectual bubbles of Birmingham, Madison, or Mobile, but they carry the day in Alabama every time. Sounds like the electoral college, but I digress.
Finally, in a few races close to home in the Bessemer Division: Don’t trust Bobby Humphryes with your money. Just don’t. Benny Watson, after getting the run around, he was a great help in getting set up after the move across town. He’s earned my vote.
In the judicial races, Jill Ganus, Teresa Petelos, Tracie Todd, Jim Hughey, and Katrina Ross. If these people are on your ballot, they will do a great job serving the people of Alabama.
Finally, Public Service Commission. Lucy Baxley has done an amazing job as Public Service Commission President. As one of the last Democrats to hold a state-wide public office, what she has done has been remarkable. She oversaw a refund to the Alabama Power customers who were charge too much. Baxley has helped steady gas and electric rates during her time in office. She has balanced the interests of large companies, jobs, and people as the President of the Public Service Commission. She has done her job and done it well. That’s why Baxley deserves another term as President.
Wow…that’s a lot. If you made it down this far, I thank you. Please share if you feel so inclined.